Warning From Russia

You can bet the American Press won’t cover this story.  They won’t even recognize it.  But we should listen to people that have already lived through the place Obama wants to take us.

American Capitalism Gone With A Whimper 

    
It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. 
 
True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists. 
 
Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters. 
 
First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather than the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas than the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”.  Pride blind the foolish. 
 
Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more than Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more than happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power.  Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America . 
 
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama.  His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive.  His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America ‘s short history but in the world.  If this keeps up for more than another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Weimar Republic and at worst  Zimbabwe . 
 
These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all.  First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, losses, and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars.  These make our Russian oligarchs look little more than ordinary street thugs, in comparison.  Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes.  Should we congratulate them? 
 
These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another.  They are also usurping the rights, duties, and powers of the American congress (parliament).  Again, congress has put up little more than a whimper to their masters. 
 
Then came Barack Obama’s command that GM’s (General Motors) president step down from leadership of his company.  That is correct, dear reader, in the land of “pure” free markets, the American president now has the power, the self-given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will.  Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions. 
 
So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a “bold” move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies..  I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less than two months ago, warned Obama and UK’s Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our “wise” Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride. 
 
Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper…but a “free man” whimper. 
 
So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set “fair” maximum salaries, evaluate performance, and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses?   
Senator Barney Frank, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort.  He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive. 
 
The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left. 

The proud American will go down into his slavery without a fight, beating his chest, and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is.  The world will only snicker.

The Coming Insurrection: Anarchists’ Revolution

Glenn Beck has turned into a bit of an Oprah-styled book pusher.  While Oprah pushes books that are entertaining, Beck pushes books that tend to be more educational, biographies and books of a political nature.  While Beck is an unabashed Conservative, he has no problem recommending books with a liberal slant.  It may seem odd to many that a Conservative would recommend Robert Creamer’s “Stand Up Straight” or the “Invisible Committee’s” “The Coming Insurrection” but Beck seems to understand that we need to know as much about our opposition as possible.

In the case of “The Coming Insurrection” by the “Invisible Committee” and distributed in the US by The MIT Press, Beck misses by  large margin.  The problem Beck makes is that he is attempting to make an interpretation based on what the Invisible Committee said combined with his own understanding of the words they use.  While that works with books by American writers it doesn’t always translate so well from french to english or, as in this particular situation, from one ideology to another.

Beck has decided that the threat to Europe, and to the US soon after Europe’s collapse is Communism.  To be fair to Beck, the Invisible Committee wrote in The Coming Insurrection on page 16 that it was in fact communism. 

“Two centuries of capitalism and market nihilism have brought us to the most extreme alienations-from ourselves, from others, from worlds.  The fiction of the individual has decomposed at the same speed that it was becoming real.  Children of the metropolis, we offer you this wager: that it’s in the most profound deprivation of existence, perpetually stifled, perpetually conjured away that the possibility of communism resides.

When all is said and done, it’s with an entire anthropology that we are at war.  With the very idea of man.

Communism then, as presupposition and as experiment.  Sharing of sensibility and elaboration of sharing.  The uncovering of what is common and the building of a force.  Communism as the matrix of a meticulous, audacious assault on domination.  As a call and as a name for all worlds resisting imperial pacification, all solidarities irreducible to the reign of commodities, all friendships assuming the necessities of war: COMMUNISM.We know it’s a term to be used with caution.  Not because, in the great parade of words, it may no longer be very fashionable.  But because our worst enemies have used it, and continue to do so.  We insist.  Certain words are like battle-grounds: their meaning, revolutionary or reactionary, is a victory, to be torn from the jaws of struggle.”

The authors use the right words.  Communism.  Imperialism.  But also indicate a disdain for what modern American society generally refers to as communism.  But their disdain is neither limited solely to a political system nor to any particular economic system.  Their hatred is reserved for all of society, for civilization itself.  On pages 85 and 86 the authors declare their hatred of all of civilization.

“The first global slaughter, which from 1914 to 1918 did away with a large portion of the urban and rural proletariat, was waged in the name of freedom, democracy, and civilization.  For the past five years, the so-called “war on terror” with its special operations and targeted assassinations has been pursued in the name of these same values.  Yet the resemblance stops there: at the level of appearances.  The value of civilization is no longer so obvious that it can be brought to the natives as a package.  Freedom is no longer a name scrawled on walls, for today it is always followed, as if by its shadow, with the word “security.”  And it is well-known that democracy can be dissolved in pure and simple “emergency” edicts-for example, in the official reinstitution of torture in the US, or in France’s Perben II law.

In a single century, freedom, democracy and civilization have reverted to the state of hypotheses.  The leaders’ work from now on consists in shaping the material and moral as well as symbolic and social conditions in which these hypotheses can be more or less validated, in configuring spaces where they can seem to function.  All means to these ends are acceptable, even the least democratic, the least civilized, the most repressive.  It was a century in which democracy regularly presided over the birth of fascist regimes, civilization constantly rhymed-to the tune of Wagner or Iron Maiden-with extermination, and in which, one day in 1929, freedom showed its two faces: a banker throwing himself from a window and a family of workers dying of hunger.  Since then-let’s say, since 1945-it’s taken for granted that manipulating the masses, secret service operations, the restriction of public liberties, and the complete sovereignty of a wide array of police forces were appropriate ways to ensure democracy, freedom and civilization.  At the final stage of this evolution, we see the first socialist mayor of Paris putting the finishing touches on urban pacification with a new police protocol for a poor neighborhood, announced with the following carefully chosen words:”We’re building a civilized space here.”  There’s nothing more to say, everything has to be destroyed.

How does one destroy all of civilization?  How does one replace civilization after its destruction?

Pages 97 through 132 give the strategy these people intend to use. 

1. “Attach yourself to what you feel to be true.”

2. “Don’t back away from what is political in friendship.”

3. “Expect nothing from organizations.  Beware of all existing social milieus, and above all, don’t become one.”

4. “Form communes.”

5. “Get organized in order to no longer have to work.”

6. “Plunder, cultivate, fabricate.”

7. “Training and learning.”

8. “Create territories.  Multiply zones of opacity.”

9. “Travel.  Open our lines of communication.”

10. “Remove all obstacles, one by one.”

11. “Flee visibility.  Turn anonymity into an offensive position.”

12. “Organize self-defense.”

13. “Sabotage every representative authority.  Spread the talk.  Abolish general assemblies.”

14. “Block the economy, but measure our blocking power by our level of self-organization.”

15. “Liberate territory from police occupation.  Avoid direct confrontation if possible.”

16. “Take up arms.  Do everything possible to make their use unnecessary.  Against the army, the only victory is political.”

17. “Depose authorities at a local level.”

18. “All power to the communes.”

After they have succeeded in killing civilization as we know it how will they replace it?  What the authors have envisioned and written about indicates that they intend to bring about an anarcho-socialist, postapocalyptic, fantastical Mad Max styled society of loosely connected, sovereign communes.  Dog eat dog, the strong prey on the weak.  The only rule is survival.  A society where theft and violence is the name of the game, take what you want or need, if you can’t take it, trade for it. Fight for it, barter is plan B, no other options.

Right now, it is easy to say the threat is only in Europe.  No threat to the US.  In truth, the US has already had similar riots in Seattle and Washington DC in the name of protesting the IMF and the World Bank.  If the riots continue to spread in Europe, they will happen in the US again.  When protest leads to riots, riots feed on themsleves.  What happens in Europe will happen in the US.

Valerie Jarret Identifies Obama’s “Change” So Far

Valerie Jarret was on NBC’s Meet the Press tonight.  She was kind enough to point out all of the “changes” Obama has been nice enough to deliver for the United States.  When then Senator Obama was campaigning for the White House he promised “change.”  Without a doubt Jarret, a top White House Advisor, and close family friend( Obama says Jarret is like a sister), wants to boost Obama’s image.  She wants us to see Obama as the first politician to actually deliver on campaign promises.  And without a doubt Jarret may well be right, Obama has delivered on his campaign promise of change.

“I think what we’ve seen is a dramatic difference in terms of how the United States is perceived around the world,” Jarrett said on Meet the Press.  I would have to agree wholeheartedly with Miss Jarret’s opinion, we have seen a dramatic difference in how the world sees the US. 

 Case in point, on Christmas Day a Nigerian born Muslim was caught attempting to explode his underwear on a flight to Detroit.  We soon found out that under Obama’s watch the Underwear Bomber’s father had warned Hillary Clinton’s State Department and Obama’s Intelligence angencies.  Those agencies, under Obama’s, watch would never profile a poor innocent Muslim and he would have succeeded if not for American citizens that forgot they were supposed to be understanding under Obama’s watch.  After the 9/11 attack and under George Bush’s leadership, the world didn’t think we were so weak that they could attempt to do this often.  There were tests of course, Richard Reid was just such a test. 

 Under Obama’s watch we had an Army Psychiatrist that was also a Muslim terrorist attack, kill and wound soldiers at Fort Hood that were in the process of deploying to the war.  Under Obama’s watch, we found out that this murdering Son of a Bitch had been watched by the FBI for sending emails to a top Al-Qaeda cleric and recruiter.  Under Obama’s watch the FBI would watch Major Hassan but would never deign to profile and interrupt his nefarious plans.  Obama failed to profile this nut-case and call him a terrorist in the beginning.  In fact Obama actually cautioned us against blaming Islam or calling it terrorism.

Under Obama’s watch, it took 6 months to find 30,000 of the 35,000 to 80,000 troops that General McChrystal needed to win in Afghanistan.  It also took only 3 hours to find in excess of 10,000 troops to send unarmed into Haiti for earthquake relief.  They were sent unarmed because under Obama’s watch we can afford $100,000,000 to help Haiti’s, but we can’t find enough for weapons and ammunition so our troops can protect themselves from gangs of Haitians armed with machetes.

Let’s not forget Iran.  Under Obama’s watch we opted to “talk” to Iran about their nuclear program.  We talked like friends, Iran opened a new plutonium processing plant.  We talked like friends, Iran opened fire on innocent Iranian citizens that stood up to protest a stolen election.  Under Obama’s watch we stood by and watched as though nothing was happening.  Under Obama’s watch the assault on the Iranian people was only wrong when it began to affect Obama’s poll numbers at home.

Under Obama’s watch we had member’s of Obama’s staff talk about Hugo Chavez’s great “revolution.”  In return Chavez complained heavily about Obama and accused the US of occupying Haiti.

Under Obama’s watch we gave Great Britain a gift. We gave them the bust of Winston Churchill that Britain had given us.  Under Obama’s watch we also Gave the Prime Minister of Great Britain two toy Marine One helicopters for his kids, and some dvd’s that he can’t watch in Britain.  Under Obama’s watch we also gave the Queen of England an Ipod with all of Obama’s speeches in it.

Does the world see us differently under Obama?  Without a doubt, Miss Jarret, I would have to agree.  The world does see us differently, but it isn’t a good change.

Jarret also credited the president with having “pulled back the economy from the brink of disaster.”  Under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out the banks and received partial ownership of the same banks.  And under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out Chrysler and GM.  In both cases the Government came out owning the companies in question.  Under Obama’s watch he has asked for legislation giving him authority to take over any company that he believes is a “risk” to the nation’s economy.  Under Obama’s watch the Government has attempted to forcefully takeover 1/6th of the nations economy with a takeover of healthcare.  In spite of polls that show m ore than 60% of the population is opposed to the proposed healthcare reform.  Under Obama’s watch Obama continues to push for the healthcare reform rejected by the people, claiming that just hasn’t explained it well enough.  He hasn’t explained it at all but has tried to call people “liars” when they take the time to read the bill and explain it themselves.  Under Obama’s watch we passed a stimulus bill that nobody other than Obama and his staff wanted.  The result was billions of dollars spent to “create or save” jobs in congressional districts that don’t exist and in zip codes that don’t exist.  In fact, it has now been reported that jobs were “created or saved” in companies that don’t exist.  Under Obama’s watch and in an effort to make it easier for the simple minded “regular” people to understrand, companies no longer have to specify how many jobs were “created or saved” with stimulus money, now if they only received $10 of stimulus money every job at the company was “created or saved.”  

Under Obama’s watch the IRS has vowed to crack down on “tax cheats.”  Citizens and companies that don’t pay their taxes as required will be under extra scrutiny under Obama’s watch; IRS and Postal agents and members of Obama’s staff excluded, under Obama’s watch.

Jarret didn’t stop there, she had more signs of change Obama has given us.  “That’s an enormous amount of change when you consider where we were a year ago right on the brink,” she said. “And he’s adding discipline in government to try to get control over our fiscal house. So I think that we’ve seen enormous change.”  Without a doubt Obama has given us fiscal discipline.  There hasn’t been a President in the entire history of our great nation that can spend like Obama has.  In twelve short months under Obama’s watch our national debt has grown three times what it was under Former President Bush’s eight years.  Under Obama’s watch we have borrowed to the point the Chinese are now reluctant to loan to us anymore.  Under Obama’s watch we have developed a new way to borrow money we now boroow it from the US,  That’s right, under Obama’s watch we now borrow money from ourselves.  As the world has becoming increasingly dependent on the American dollar they cringe in fear at what we are doing to the dollar and how it will affect them.  Under Obama’s watch the world loves us for what we are doing to them all.

Under Obama’s watch average, God-fearing, loyal, patriotic Americans have been called terrorists for having the audacity to believe in the Constitution, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and exercising their right to vote for the candidate of their choice even if that candidate was Ron Paul.  Under Obama’s watch Americans were called Nazi’s for attending Tea Parties and Town Hall Meetings to express their concerns about what was happening in Washington DC.  Under Obama’s watch we have been lead rapidly towards a totalitarion regime where the “citizens” are nothing more than slaves to the Government, and the Governmet officials are subject to a completely different set of rules and laws than the “regular” people.

Under Obama’s watch change was promised and, by God, change was delivered.  Valerie Jarret was right.  But is change really a good thing?