Valerie Jarret was on NBC’s Meet the Press tonight. She was kind enough to point out all of the “changes” Obama has been nice enough to deliver for the United States. When then Senator Obama was campaigning for the White House he promised “change.” Without a doubt Jarret, a top White House Advisor, and close family friend( Obama says Jarret is like a sister), wants to boost Obama’s image. She wants us to see Obama as the first politician to actually deliver on campaign promises. And without a doubt Jarret may well be right, Obama has delivered on his campaign promise of change.
“I think what we’ve seen is a dramatic difference in terms of how the United States is perceived around the world,” Jarrett said on Meet the Press. I would have to agree wholeheartedly with Miss Jarret’s opinion, we have seen a dramatic difference in how the world sees the US.
Case in point, on Christmas Day a Nigerian born Muslim was caught attempting to explode his underwear on a flight to Detroit. We soon found out that under Obama’s watch the Underwear Bomber’s father had warned Hillary Clinton’s State Department and Obama’s Intelligence angencies. Those agencies, under Obama’s, watch would never profile a poor innocent Muslim and he would have succeeded if not for American citizens that forgot they were supposed to be understanding under Obama’s watch. After the 9/11 attack and under George Bush’s leadership, the world didn’t think we were so weak that they could attempt to do this often. There were tests of course, Richard Reid was just such a test.
Under Obama’s watch we had an Army Psychiatrist that was also a Muslim terrorist attack, kill and wound soldiers at Fort Hood that were in the process of deploying to the war. Under Obama’s watch, we found out that this murdering Son of a Bitch had been watched by the FBI for sending emails to a top Al-Qaeda cleric and recruiter. Under Obama’s watch the FBI would watch Major Hassan but would never deign to profile and interrupt his nefarious plans. Obama failed to profile this nut-case and call him a terrorist in the beginning. In fact Obama actually cautioned us against blaming Islam or calling it terrorism.
Under Obama’s watch, it took 6 months to find 30,000 of the 35,000 to 80,000 troops that General McChrystal needed to win in Afghanistan. It also took only 3 hours to find in excess of 10,000 troops to send unarmed into Haiti for earthquake relief. They were sent unarmed because under Obama’s watch we can afford $100,000,000 to help Haiti’s, but we can’t find enough for weapons and ammunition so our troops can protect themselves from gangs of Haitians armed with machetes.
Let’s not forget Iran. Under Obama’s watch we opted to “talk” to Iran about their nuclear program. We talked like friends, Iran opened a new plutonium processing plant. We talked like friends, Iran opened fire on innocent Iranian citizens that stood up to protest a stolen election. Under Obama’s watch we stood by and watched as though nothing was happening. Under Obama’s watch the assault on the Iranian people was only wrong when it began to affect Obama’s poll numbers at home.
Under Obama’s watch we had member’s of Obama’s staff talk about Hugo Chavez’s great “revolution.” In return Chavez complained heavily about Obama and accused the US of occupying Haiti.
Under Obama’s watch we gave Great Britain a gift. We gave them the bust of Winston Churchill that Britain had given us. Under Obama’s watch we also Gave the Prime Minister of Great Britain two toy Marine One helicopters for his kids, and some dvd’s that he can’t watch in Britain. Under Obama’s watch we also gave the Queen of England an Ipod with all of Obama’s speeches in it.
Does the world see us differently under Obama? Without a doubt, Miss Jarret, I would have to agree. The world does see us differently, but it isn’t a good change.
Jarret also credited the president with having “pulled back the economy from the brink of disaster.” Under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out the banks and received partial ownership of the same banks. And under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out Chrysler and GM. In both cases the Government came out owning the companies in question. Under Obama’s watch he has asked for legislation giving him authority to take over any company that he believes is a “risk” to the nation’s economy. Under Obama’s watch the Government has attempted to forcefully takeover 1/6th of the nations economy with a takeover of healthcare. In spite of polls that show m ore than 60% of the population is opposed to the proposed healthcare reform. Under Obama’s watch Obama continues to push for the healthcare reform rejected by the people, claiming that just hasn’t explained it well enough. He hasn’t explained it at all but has tried to call people “liars” when they take the time to read the bill and explain it themselves. Under Obama’s watch we passed a stimulus bill that nobody other than Obama and his staff wanted. The result was billions of dollars spent to “create or save” jobs in congressional districts that don’t exist and in zip codes that don’t exist. In fact, it has now been reported that jobs were “created or saved” in companies that don’t exist. Under Obama’s watch and in an effort to make it easier for the simple minded “regular” people to understrand, companies no longer have to specify how many jobs were “created or saved” with stimulus money, now if they only received $10 of stimulus money every job at the company was “created or saved.”
Under Obama’s watch the IRS has vowed to crack down on “tax cheats.” Citizens and companies that don’t pay their taxes as required will be under extra scrutiny under Obama’s watch; IRS and Postal agents and members of Obama’s staff excluded, under Obama’s watch.
Jarret didn’t stop there, she had more signs of change Obama has given us. “That’s an enormous amount of change when you consider where we were a year ago right on the brink,” she said. “And he’s adding discipline in government to try to get control over our fiscal house. So I think that we’ve seen enormous change.” Without a doubt Obama has given us fiscal discipline. There hasn’t been a President in the entire history of our great nation that can spend like Obama has. In twelve short months under Obama’s watch our national debt has grown three times what it was under Former President Bush’s eight years. Under Obama’s watch we have borrowed to the point the Chinese are now reluctant to loan to us anymore. Under Obama’s watch we have developed a new way to borrow money we now boroow it from the US, That’s right, under Obama’s watch we now borrow money from ourselves. As the world has becoming increasingly dependent on the American dollar they cringe in fear at what we are doing to the dollar and how it will affect them. Under Obama’s watch the world loves us for what we are doing to them all.
Under Obama’s watch average, God-fearing, loyal, patriotic Americans have been called terrorists for having the audacity to believe in the Constitution, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and exercising their right to vote for the candidate of their choice even if that candidate was Ron Paul. Under Obama’s watch Americans were called Nazi’s for attending Tea Parties and Town Hall Meetings to express their concerns about what was happening in Washington DC. Under Obama’s watch we have been lead rapidly towards a totalitarion regime where the “citizens” are nothing more than slaves to the Government, and the Governmet officials are subject to a completely different set of rules and laws than the “regular” people.
Under Obama’s watch change was promised and, by God, change was delivered. Valerie Jarret was right. But is change really a good thing?
The Democrats like to talk about Democracy, what the people want, ”the People’s will.” According to recent polling, what the people do NOT want is a a government takeover of their healthcare. It has been the subject of polls, Tea Parties, and town hall meetings. But now the government has decided to ignore the will of the people. They will push through healthcare reform regardless of what the citizenry think. The prevailing theory in Washington is that we will learn to like it after we have it.
That isn’t “democracy.” It is dictatorship, it is totaltitarion, it is BULLSHIT, and it is totally expected. Anyone that studied the Democrats, even just a little, would have known where Obama was headed. Healthcare reform is only the start. There is still Cap and Trade, the census being moved to the White House, the potential redistricting of congressional districts to limit political opposition, redistribution of wealth to the government for the benefit of the poor, and more, much more.
When Obama won the election I wrote that we had seen our last election. Each day we get closer to fulfilling that prediction. But you didn’t have to be Miss Cleo to see the writing on the wall. You just needed to read the words of Saul Alinsky, to learn about Liberation Theology, to study who Obama had studied, to learn what Obama had learned.
During the campaign, Obama quipped, “Next they will call me a communist because I want to get healthcare for everyone.” Not exactly, Mr. Obama. We will call you a communist because you are a communist, a totalitariate, a dictator.
What will Obama’s next steps be? Will he prevent the elections of 2010 and 2012? How can he justify it to the nation? How can he justify it? How will he enforce it?
As Rahm Emmanual said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Obama and his administration has ddefinately pushed for a “good crisis.” With several reports about “right-wing extremists” being terrorists, Tea Partiers being violent extremists, and attendees at Town Hall meetings being violent, Obama has sought to enrage the right, to cause diorder and discontent. He has sought to create a crisis that he could use. If he succeeds in getting his “crisis” there is now doubt that he will use it as a reason to crack down violently on the American people. As Alinsky wrote in “Rules For Radicals” , “The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only if they are achievable and worth the cost; of means , only whether they will work. To say that corrupt means corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles. The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” He went on to write, “in action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistant both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter.” While the Democracy Alinsky and Obama both preached for requires that the people get the deciding vote in what is a legitimate end, in Alinsky’s view, and Obama’s, it is the “man of action” that gets to make those decisions, what they believe is in society’s best interest. And they get to decide what is a legitimate tactic. based on what will force their way on the population that may disagree with them. We already know that Pelosi and Reid have said that we “will like it when we get it” even though the vast majority of the country has said we don’t want it. Obama, Pelsoi and Reid Believe they know what is in our best interest, apparently self-determination isn’t. According to Alinsky’s writings any tactic for achieving what Obama has decided is in our best interests is legitimate if it will work. Including suspending the elections, forcing his will(since he knows more about what is in our best interest) and even using military force against the America people.
Alinsky paraphrased Lenin’s speeches during the Bolshevik uprisings as lenin effectively saying,”They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.” Obama has the guns now, he is the Commnader-in-Chief of the US military. The question becomes will the military follow orders and fire on the American people to enforce Obama’s will, his desire to takeover “for the good of mankind” since he knows what is in our best interest. If the military won’t follow him, Obama has a backup plan. He spoke of it during the campaign. A National Civilian Security Force(as strong and well funded as the military), because we can’t rely on the military alone to protect us. Who will make up that Civilian Security Force? Who will be Obama’s Brownshirts? Memebers of SEIU and ACORN and the Communist Party USA. We have already seen SEIU members beat a crippled man to the point of hospitalization at a Tea Party in St Loius. Those Brownshirts were protected by Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder. They finally charged with “public disturbance after months of pressure from the Right, but only after months of pressure. The purple shirted SEIU member that bit the finger off of a Tea Partier in California didn’t have that problem, he was never charged. If Obama can’t get the military to back his plan, he can always get the Leftists at SEIU and ACORN and the CPUSA to back him. And he will.
With financing from China, Obama seems destined to take unreversable control of the United States. Some have suggested that China may well dump the T-Bills they they have purchased from us, thereby sending the American dollar into a tailspin with no possible recovery. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hate to disappoint the “experts” but China will never allow the dollar to tank, the only reason they have purchased our debt so far is to prevent the dollar from tanking. If the American dollar tanks for any reason, Obama’s ineptedness or China’s dumping of T-Bills on the world economy, it would drive the citizens of theis country to revolt, probably even to armed revolt. China can no more afford an armed revolt in the US than the US can afford an armed revolt in Pakistan, and for the same reason. If Pakistan falls, they have nuclear weapons and we don’t know who will end up with control of those weapons but we do know some of the interested parties and what they would do with them. For that reason we would intervene to keep Pakistan in the hands of those we trust. China’s security interests lay in keeping our nuclear weapons out of the hands of those they don’t trust here. For that one reason China will never allow a civil war here. Russia will be right along with China in protecting their interests by protecting the staus quo in this country. Anyone who thinks Obama is an idiot is sadly mistaken. He is nothing if he isn’t a brilliant strategist. Without doubt he already knows exactly what I am speaking about and has already planned for it. Along with SEIU, ACORN and the CPUSA, Obama will be able to count on support from China and Russia.
With this in mind, one can clearly see that Glenn Beck is right when he denounces any form of violence. Unfortunately Beck also believes that we can get out of this by turning back to God. In a prefect world, beck would be right, but, in a perfect world we wouldn’t be in this postition. The truth is that God has always demended that we (as Obama put it) “have some skin in the game.” God told Noah to build the Ark and gather the animals. God Sent Moses to Pharoah to secure the release of the Hebrews. God made the Hebrews wander in the desert for 40 years so they would appreciate their freedom when they finally got to the Promised Land. Even our own Founding Fathers had to “bleed” for their freedom and their new found nation. So it has always been, and so it will be this time. It doesn’t have to be outright conflict and those of us on the Right should never fire the first shot. But we must be prepared to defend ourselves when Obama does. We need to reach to China and Russia to ensure they know we are not a threat to them, that we only seek to maintain our freedom. We have to at all times maintain the moral high ground. But maintaining the moral high ground should never put us in a position to be destroyed by someone who believes anything goes in his war for equal opportunity poverty enforced by the government.
Until Obama makes the use of force necessary, we need to concentrate heavily on Tea Parties, protests and rallies, letters, emails and phone calls to Congress. We need to study the enemy, read the words, books and speeches of Obama; read Alinsky; read the words of Obama’s cohorts in Government; know their agenda, their tactics. And give those tactics back to them.
Alinsky wrote in “Rules for Radicals” that when he organized the Blacks in Rochester, Ny, they talked about tactics that they could use. One proposed tactic was to purchase 100 tickets for the Rochester Symphony, feed 100 Blacks three hours worth of baked beans, only baked beans, then send them to the symphony hall to enjoy the symphony and to sound off their protests.
Since these are the tactics the Left understand, and since the Left has stunk up our Congress and our Nation for so long, I believe the time has come to let them know what we think of them. I am proposing a National Been Feed and Congressional Meet in Washington DC on June 14, 2010. It is Flag Day, a monday, and a working day for Congress. It will also come at a reasonable time to help convince Obama that he lacks the support of the American people and to attempt to sway him into resigning now for the sake of the Nation.
from → Liberals, Obama, conflict, democrats, healthcare, politics, republicans, war
President Obama chose West Point to mgive his speech on his new strategy for Afghanistan. He got a luke warm reception at best. Cadets appeared to be sleeping during Obama’s speech. They had to be ordered to applaud. Reports from soldiers in Afghanistan indicate that Obama did no better with the troops in the field.
Obama announced that he was sending 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, but would withdraw them in 18 months. What he failed to acknowledge was what has become know to the troops as the Karzai 12. The Washington times described it this way, “
“Karzai 12″ refers to Afghanistan’s newly re-elected president, Hamid Karzai, and a dozen rules set down by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, to try to keep Afghan civilian casualties to a minimum.
The Times compiled an informal list of the new rules from interviews with U.S. forces. Among them:
• No night or surprise searches.
• Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.
• ANA or ANP must accompany U.S. units on searches.
• U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to fire first.
• U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.
• Only women can search women.
• Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED but not if insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.
These rules sound great, if one is the enemy we are fighting. They are a great way to lose a war. They are an even greater way to get thousands of American soldiers and marines killed. As the Times pointed out, the Taliban doesn’t have to obey these rules, only we do. If Obama wants to win this war, he should take a lesson from the last great war the US actually fought to win. He should look to our fathers and grandfathers that won WWII. They carpet bomber Berlin and never lost a minute of sleep. Any idea how many civilians died at that time? Or when the Enola Gray dropped her nuclear bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Did our leaders lose sleep over the loss of civilian lives then? NO. We did what we had to do to win, to protect American lives at home. Obama is fighting this war like an idiot child with his “if we are nice to them, they will be nice to us attitude.”
Should Obama send additional troops? Without a doubt, he should send the 40,000 General McChrystal needs, and the additional 80,000 he would like to have. And in order to actually win this war, Obama needs to immediately change the Rules of Engagement to reflect our desire to actually win. The only rule we need is if they appear to be the enemy, kill them. If civilians get hurt, sorry but it is a war, that is what happens in war. Next time the civilians that don’t want to get hurt in war will stop the Taliban and their Al-Qaeda counterparts from starting a war with America.
from → Liberals, Obama, afghanistan, conflict, democrats, politics, republicans, war
