Skip to content

Warning From Russia

March 28, 2010


You can bet the American Press won’t cover this story.  They won’t even recognize it.  But we should listen to people that have already lived through the place Obama wants to take us.

American Capitalism Gone With A Whimper 

   
 
It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. 
 
True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists. 
 
Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters. 
 
First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather than the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas than the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”.  Pride blind the foolish. 
 
Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more than Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more than happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power.  Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America . 
 
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama.  His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive.  His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America ‘s short history but in the world.  If this keeps up for more than another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Weimar Republic and at worst  Zimbabwe . 
 
These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all.  First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, losses, and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars.  These make our Russian oligarchs look little more than ordinary street thugs, in comparison.  Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes.  Should we congratulate them? 
 
These men, of course, are not an elected panel but made up of appointees picked from the very financial oligarchs and their henchmen who are now gorging themselves on trillions of American dollars, in one bailout after another.  They are also usurping the rights, duties, and powers of the American congress (parliament).  Again, congress has put up little more than a whimper to their masters. 
 
Then came Barack Obama’s command that GM’s (General Motors) president step down from leadership of his company.  That is correct, dear reader, in the land of “pure” free markets, the American president now has the power, the self-given power, to fire CEOs and we can assume other employees of private companies, at will.  Come hither, go dither, the centurion commands his minions. 
 
So it should be no surprise, that the American president has followed this up with a “bold” move of declaring that he and another group of unelected, chosen stooges will now redesign the entire automotive industry and will even be the guarantee of automobile policies..  I am sure that if given the chance, they would happily try and redesign it for the whole of the world, too. Prime Minister Putin, less than two months ago, warned Obama and UK’s Blair, not to follow the path to Marxism, it only leads to disaster. Apparently, even though we suffered 70 years of this Western sponsored horror show, we know nothing, as foolish, drunken Russians, so let our “wise” Anglo-Saxon fools find out the folly of their own pride. 
 
Again, the American public has taken this with barely a whimper…but a “free man” whimper. 
 
So, should it be any surprise to discover that the Democratically controlled Congress of America is working on passing a new regulation that would give the American Treasury department the power to set “fair” maximum salaries, evaluate performance, and control how private companies give out pay raises and bonuses?   
Senator Barney Frank, a social pervert basking in his homosexuality (of course, amongst the modern, enlightened American societal norm, as well as that of the general West, homosexuality is not only not a looked down upon life choice, but is often praised as a virtue) and his Marxist enlightenment, has led this effort.  He stresses that this only affects companies that receive government monies, but it is retroactive and taken to a logical extreme, this would include any company or industry that has ever received a tax break or incentive. 
 
The Russian owners of American companies and industries should look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left. 

The proud American will go down into his slavery without a fight, beating his chest, and proclaiming to the world, how free he really is.  The world will only snicker.

The Coming Insurrection: Anarchists’ Revolution

February 21, 2010

Glenn Beck has turned into a bit of an Oprah-styled book pusher.  While Oprah pushes books that are entertaining, Beck pushes books that tend to be more educational, biographies and books of a political nature.  While Beck is an unabashed Conservative, he has no problem recommending books with a liberal slant.  It may seem odd to many that a Conservative would recommend Robert Creamer’s “Stand Up Straight” or the “Invisible Committee’s” “The Coming Insurrection” but Beck seems to understand that we need to know as much about our opposition as possible.

In the case of “The Coming Insurrection” by the “Invisible Committee” and distributed in the US by The MIT Press, Beck misses by  large margin.  The problem Beck makes is that he is attempting to make an interpretation based on what the Invisible Committee said combined with his own understanding of the words they use.  While that works with books by American writers it doesn’t always translate so well from french to english or, as in this particular situation, from one ideology to another.

Beck has decided that the threat to Europe, and to the US soon after Europe’s collapse is Communism.  To be fair to Beck, the Invisible Committee wrote in The Coming Insurrection on page 16 that it was in fact communism. 

“Two centuries of capitalism and market nihilism have brought us to the most extreme alienations-from ourselves, from others, from worlds.  The fiction of the individual has decomposed at the same speed that it was becoming real.  Children of the metropolis, we offer you this wager: that it’s in the most profound deprivation of existence, perpetually stifled, perpetually conjured away that the possibility of communism resides.

When all is said and done, it’s with an entire anthropology that we are at war.  With the very idea of man.

Communism then, as presupposition and as experiment.  Sharing of sensibility and elaboration of sharing.  The uncovering of what is common and the building of a force.  Communism as the matrix of a meticulous, audacious assault on domination.  As a call and as a name for all worlds resisting imperial pacification, all solidarities irreducible to the reign of commodities, all friendships assuming the necessities of war: COMMUNISM.We know it’s a term to be used with caution.  Not because, in the great parade of words, it may no longer be very fashionable.  But because our worst enemies have used it, and continue to do so.  We insist.  Certain words are like battle-grounds: their meaning, revolutionary or reactionary, is a victory, to be torn from the jaws of struggle.”

The authors use the right words.  Communism.  Imperialism.  But also indicate a disdain for what modern American society generally refers to as communism.  But their disdain is neither limited solely to a political system nor to any particular economic system.  Their hatred is reserved for all of society, for civilization itself.  On pages 85 and 86 the authors declare their hatred of all of civilization.

“The first global slaughter, which from 1914 to 1918 did away with a large portion of the urban and rural proletariat, was waged in the name of freedom, democracy, and civilization.  For the past five years, the so-called “war on terror” with its special operations and targeted assassinations has been pursued in the name of these same values.  Yet the resemblance stops there: at the level of appearances.  The value of civilization is no longer so obvious that it can be brought to the natives as a package.  Freedom is no longer a name scrawled on walls, for today it is always followed, as if by its shadow, with the word “security.”  And it is well-known that democracy can be dissolved in pure and simple “emergency” edicts-for example, in the official reinstitution of torture in the US, or in France’s Perben II law.

In a single century, freedom, democracy and civilization have reverted to the state of hypotheses.  The leaders’ work from now on consists in shaping the material and moral as well as symbolic and social conditions in which these hypotheses can be more or less validated, in configuring spaces where they can seem to function.  All means to these ends are acceptable, even the least democratic, the least civilized, the most repressive.  It was a century in which democracy regularly presided over the birth of fascist regimes, civilization constantly rhymed-to the tune of Wagner or Iron Maiden-with extermination, and in which, one day in 1929, freedom showed its two faces: a banker throwing himself from a window and a family of workers dying of hunger.  Since then-let’s say, since 1945-it’s taken for granted that manipulating the masses, secret service operations, the restriction of public liberties, and the complete sovereignty of a wide array of police forces were appropriate ways to ensure democracy, freedom and civilization.  At the final stage of this evolution, we see the first socialist mayor of Paris putting the finishing touches on urban pacification with a new police protocol for a poor neighborhood, announced with the following carefully chosen words:”We’re building a civilized space here.”  There’s nothing more to say, everything has to be destroyed.

How does one destroy all of civilization?  How does one replace civilization after its destruction?

Pages 97 through 132 give the strategy these people intend to use. 

1. “Attach yourself to what you feel to be true.”

2. “Don’t back away from what is political in friendship.”

3. “Expect nothing from organizations.  Beware of all existing social milieus, and above all, don’t become one.”

4. “Form communes.”

5. “Get organized in order to no longer have to work.”

6. “Plunder, cultivate, fabricate.”

7. “Training and learning.”

8. “Create territories.  Multiply zones of opacity.”

9. “Travel.  Open our lines of communication.”

10. “Remove all obstacles, one by one.”

11. “Flee visibility.  Turn anonymity into an offensive position.”

12. “Organize self-defense.”

13. “Sabotage every representative authority.  Spread the talk.  Abolish general assemblies.”

14. “Block the economy, but measure our blocking power by our level of self-organization.”

15. “Liberate territory from police occupation.  Avoid direct confrontation if possible.”

16. “Take up arms.  Do everything possible to make their use unnecessary.  Against the army, the only victory is political.”

17. “Depose authorities at a local level.”

18. “All power to the communes.”

After they have succeeded in killing civilization as we know it how will they replace it?  What the authors have envisioned and written about indicates that they intend to bring about an anarcho-socialist, postapocalyptic, fantastical Mad Max styled society of loosely connected, sovereign communes.  Dog eat dog, the strong prey on the weak.  The only rule is survival.  A society where theft and violence is the name of the game, take what you want or need, if you can’t take it, trade for it. Fight for it, barter is plan B, no other options.

Right now, it is easy to say the threat is only in Europe.  No threat to the US.  In truth, the US has already had similar riots in Seattle and Washington DC in the name of protesting the IMF and the World Bank.  If the riots continue to spread in Europe, they will happen in the US again.  When protest leads to riots, riots feed on themsleves.  What happens in Europe will happen in the US.

Valerie Jarret Identifies Obama’s “Change” So Far

January 24, 2010

Valerie Jarret was on NBC’s Meet the Press tonight.  She was kind enough to point out all of the “changes” Obama has been nice enough to deliver for the United States.  When then Senator Obama was campaigning for the White House he promised “change.”  Without a doubt Jarret, a top White House Advisor, and close family friend( Obama says Jarret is like a sister), wants to boost Obama’s image.  She wants us to see Obama as the first politician to actually deliver on campaign promises.  And without a doubt Jarret may well be right, Obama has delivered on his campaign promise of change.

“I think what we’ve seen is a dramatic difference in terms of how the United States is perceived around the world,” Jarrett said on Meet the Press.  I would have to agree wholeheartedly with Miss Jarret’s opinion, we have seen a dramatic difference in how the world sees the US. 

 Case in point, on Christmas Day a Nigerian born Muslim was caught attempting to explode his underwear on a flight to Detroit.  We soon found out that under Obama’s watch the Underwear Bomber’s father had warned Hillary Clinton’s State Department and Obama’s Intelligence angencies.  Those agencies, under Obama’s, watch would never profile a poor innocent Muslim and he would have succeeded if not for American citizens that forgot they were supposed to be understanding under Obama’s watch.  After the 9/11 attack and under George Bush’s leadership, the world didn’t think we were so weak that they could attempt to do this often.  There were tests of course, Richard Reid was just such a test. 

 Under Obama’s watch we had an Army Psychiatrist that was also a Muslim terrorist attack, kill and wound soldiers at Fort Hood that were in the process of deploying to the war.  Under Obama’s watch, we found out that this murdering Son of a Bitch had been watched by the FBI for sending emails to a top Al-Qaeda cleric and recruiter.  Under Obama’s watch the FBI would watch Major Hassan but would never deign to profile and interrupt his nefarious plans.  Obama failed to profile this nut-case and call him a terrorist in the beginning.  In fact Obama actually cautioned us against blaming Islam or calling it terrorism.

Under Obama’s watch, it took 6 months to find 30,000 of the 35,000 to 80,000 troops that General McChrystal needed to win in Afghanistan.  It also took only 3 hours to find in excess of 10,000 troops to send unarmed into Haiti for earthquake relief.  They were sent unarmed because under Obama’s watch we can afford $100,000,000 to help Haiti’s, but we can’t find enough for weapons and ammunition so our troops can protect themselves from gangs of Haitians armed with machetes.

Let’s not forget Iran.  Under Obama’s watch we opted to “talk” to Iran about their nuclear program.  We talked like friends, Iran opened a new plutonium processing plant.  We talked like friends, Iran opened fire on innocent Iranian citizens that stood up to protest a stolen election.  Under Obama’s watch we stood by and watched as though nothing was happening.  Under Obama’s watch the assault on the Iranian people was only wrong when it began to affect Obama’s poll numbers at home.

Under Obama’s watch we had member’s of Obama’s staff talk about Hugo Chavez’s great “revolution.”  In return Chavez complained heavily about Obama and accused the US of occupying Haiti.

Under Obama’s watch we gave Great Britain a gift. We gave them the bust of Winston Churchill that Britain had given us.  Under Obama’s watch we also Gave the Prime Minister of Great Britain two toy Marine One helicopters for his kids, and some dvd’s that he can’t watch in Britain.  Under Obama’s watch we also gave the Queen of England an Ipod with all of Obama’s speeches in it.

Does the world see us differently under Obama?  Without a doubt, Miss Jarret, I would have to agree.  The world does see us differently, but it isn’t a good change.

Jarret also credited the president with having “pulled back the economy from the brink of disaster.”  Under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out the banks and received partial ownership of the same banks.  And under Obama’s watch the Government bailed out Chrysler and GM.  In both cases the Government came out owning the companies in question.  Under Obama’s watch he has asked for legislation giving him authority to take over any company that he believes is a “risk” to the nation’s economy.  Under Obama’s watch the Government has attempted to forcefully takeover 1/6th of the nations economy with a takeover of healthcare.  In spite of polls that show m ore than 60% of the population is opposed to the proposed healthcare reform.  Under Obama’s watch Obama continues to push for the healthcare reform rejected by the people, claiming that just hasn’t explained it well enough.  He hasn’t explained it at all but has tried to call people “liars” when they take the time to read the bill and explain it themselves.  Under Obama’s watch we passed a stimulus bill that nobody other than Obama and his staff wanted.  The result was billions of dollars spent to “create or save” jobs in congressional districts that don’t exist and in zip codes that don’t exist.  In fact, it has now been reported that jobs were “created or saved” in companies that don’t exist.  Under Obama’s watch and in an effort to make it easier for the simple minded “regular” people to understrand, companies no longer have to specify how many jobs were “created or saved” with stimulus money, now if they only received $10 of stimulus money every job at the company was “created or saved.”  

Under Obama’s watch the IRS has vowed to crack down on “tax cheats.”  Citizens and companies that don’t pay their taxes as required will be under extra scrutiny under Obama’s watch; IRS and Postal agents and members of Obama’s staff excluded, under Obama’s watch.

Jarret didn’t stop there, she had more signs of change Obama has given us.  “That’s an enormous amount of change when you consider where we were a year ago right on the brink,” she said. “And he’s adding discipline in government to try to get control over our fiscal house. So I think that we’ve seen enormous change.”  Without a doubt Obama has given us fiscal discipline.  There hasn’t been a President in the entire history of our great nation that can spend like Obama has.  In twelve short months under Obama’s watch our national debt has grown three times what it was under Former President Bush’s eight years.  Under Obama’s watch we have borrowed to the point the Chinese are now reluctant to loan to us anymore.  Under Obama’s watch we have developed a new way to borrow money we now boroow it from the US,  That’s right, under Obama’s watch we now borrow money from ourselves.  As the world has becoming increasingly dependent on the American dollar they cringe in fear at what we are doing to the dollar and how it will affect them.  Under Obama’s watch the world loves us for what we are doing to them all.

Under Obama’s watch average, God-fearing, loyal, patriotic Americans have been called terrorists for having the audacity to believe in the Constitution, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, and exercising their right to vote for the candidate of their choice even if that candidate was Ron Paul.  Under Obama’s watch Americans were called Nazi’s for attending Tea Parties and Town Hall Meetings to express their concerns about what was happening in Washington DC.  Under Obama’s watch we have been lead rapidly towards a totalitarion regime where the “citizens” are nothing more than slaves to the Government, and the Governmet officials are subject to a completely different set of rules and laws than the “regular” people.

Under Obama’s watch change was promised and, by God, change was delivered.  Valerie Jarret was right.  But is change really a good thing?

Obama’s War on America and American Values

January 10, 2010

The Democrats like to talk about Democracy, what the people want, “the People’s will.”  According to recent polling, what the people do NOT want is a a government takeover of their healthcare.  It has been the subject of polls, Tea Parties, and town hall meetings.  But now the government has decided to ignore the will of the people.  They will push through healthcare reform regardless of what the citizenry think.  The prevailing theory in Washington is that we will learn to like it after we have it.

That isn’t “democracy.”  It is dictatorship, it is totaltitarion, it is BULLSHIT, and it is totally expected.  Anyone that studied the Democrats, even just a little, would have known where Obama was headed.  Healthcare reform is only the start.  There is still Cap and Trade, the census being moved to the White House, the potential redistricting of congressional districts to limit political opposition, redistribution of wealth to the government for the benefit of the poor, and more, much more.

When Obama won the election I wrote that we had seen our last election.  Each day we get closer to fulfilling that prediction.  But you didn’t have to be Miss Cleo to see the writing on the wall.  You just needed to read the words of Saul Alinsky, to learn about Liberation Theology, to study who Obama had studied, to learn what Obama had learned. 

During the campaign, Obama quipped, “Next they will call me a communist because I want to get healthcare for everyone.”  Not exactly, Mr. Obama.  We will call you a communist because you are a communist, a totalitariate, a dictator. 

What will Obama’s next steps be?  Will he prevent the elections of 2010 and 2012?  How can he justify it to the nation?  How can he justify it?  How will he enforce it?
As Rahm Emmanual said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”  Obama and his administration has ddefinately pushed for a “good crisis.”  With several reports about “right-wing  extremists” being terrorists, Tea Partiers being violent extremists, and attendees at Town Hall meetings being violent, Obama has sought to enrage the right, to cause diorder and discontent.  He has sought to create a crisis that he could use.  If he succeeds in getting his “crisis” there is now doubt that he will use it as a reason to crack down violently on the American people.  As Alinsky wrote in “Rules For Radicals” , “The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms.  He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action.  He asks of ends only if they are achievable and worth the cost; of means , only whether they will work.  To say that corrupt means corrupt the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles.  The real arena is corrupt and bloody.”   He went on to write, “in action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistant both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind.  The choice must always be for the latter.”  While the Democracy Alinsky and Obama both preached for requires that the people get the deciding vote in what is a legitimate end, in Alinsky’s view, and Obama’s, it is the “man of action” that gets to make those decisions, what they believe is in society’s best interest.  And they get to decide what is a legitimate tactic. based on what will force their way on the population that may disagree with them.  We already know that Pelosi and Reid have said that we “will like it when we get it” even though the vast majority of the country has said we don’t want it.  Obama, Pelsoi and Reid Believe they know what is in our best interest, apparently self-determination isn’t.  According to Alinsky’s writings any tactic for achieving what Obama has decided is in our best interests is legitimate if it will work.  Including suspending the elections, forcing his will(since he knows more about what is in our best interest) and even using military force against the America people. 

Alinsky paraphrased Lenin’s speeches during the Bolshevik uprisings as lenin effectively saying,”They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and reformation through the ballot.  When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.”  Obama has the guns now, he is the Commnader-in-Chief of the US military.  The question becomes will the military follow orders and fire on the American people to enforce Obama’s will, his desire to takeover “for the good of mankind” since he knows what is in our best interest.  If the military won’t follow him, Obama has a backup plan.  He spoke of it during the campaign.  A National Civilian Security Force(as strong and well funded as the military), because we can’t rely on the military alone to protect us.  Who will make up that Civilian Security Force?  Who will be Obama’s Brownshirts?  Memebers of SEIU and ACORN and the Communist Party USA.  We have already seen SEIU members beat a crippled man to the point of hospitalization at a Tea Party in St Loius.  Those Brownshirts were protected by Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder.  They finally charged with “public disturbance after months of pressure from the Right, but only after months of pressure.  The purple shirted SEIU member that bit the finger off of a Tea Partier in California didn’t have that problem, he was never charged.  If Obama can’t get the military to back his plan, he can always get the Leftists at SEIU and ACORN and the CPUSA to back him.  And he will.

With financing from China, Obama seems destined to take unreversable control of the United States.  Some have suggested that China may well dump the T-Bills they they have purchased from us, thereby sending the American dollar into a tailspin with no possible recovery.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  I hate to disappoint the “experts” but China will never allow the dollar to tank, the only reason they have purchased our debt so far is to prevent the dollar from tanking.  If the American dollar tanks for any reason, Obama’s ineptedness or China’s dumping of T-Bills on the world economy, it would drive the citizens of theis country to revolt, probably even to armed revolt.  China can no more afford an armed revolt in the US than the US can afford an armed revolt in Pakistan, and for the same reason.  If Pakistan falls, they have nuclear weapons and we don’t know who will end up with control of those weapons but we do know some of the interested parties and what they would do with them.  For that reason we would intervene to keep Pakistan in the hands of those we trust.  China’s security interests lay in keeping our nuclear weapons out of the hands of those they don’t trust here.  For that one reason China will never allow a civil war here.  Russia will be right along with China in protecting their interests by protecting the staus quo in this country.  Anyone who thinks Obama is an idiot is sadly mistaken.  He is nothing if he isn’t a brilliant strategist.  Without doubt he already knows exactly what I am speaking about and has already planned for it.  Along with SEIU, ACORN and the CPUSA, Obama will be able to count on support from China and Russia. 

With this in mind, one can clearly see that Glenn Beck is right when he denounces any form of violence.  Unfortunately Beck also believes that we can get out of this by turning back to God.  In a prefect world, beck would be right, but, in a perfect world we wouldn’t be in this postition.  The truth is that God has always demended that we (as Obama put it) “have some skin in the game.”  God told Noah to build the Ark and gather the animals.  God Sent Moses to Pharoah to secure the release of the Hebrews.  God made the Hebrews wander in the desert for 40 years so they would appreciate their freedom when they finally got to the Promised Land.  Even our own Founding Fathers had to “bleed” for their freedom and their new found nation.  So it has always been, and so it will be this time.  It doesn’t have to be outright conflict and those of us on the Right should never fire the first shot.  But we must be prepared to defend ourselves when Obama does.  We need to reach to China and Russia to ensure they know we are not a threat to them, that we only seek to maintain our freedom.  We have to at all times maintain the moral high ground.  But maintaining the moral high ground should never put us in a position to be destroyed by someone who believes anything goes in his war for equal opportunity poverty enforced by the government. 

Until Obama makes the use of force necessary, we need to concentrate heavily on Tea Parties, protests and rallies, letters, emails and phone calls to Congress.  We need to study the enemy, read the words, books and speeches of Obama; read Alinsky; read the words of Obama’s cohorts in Government; know their agenda, their tactics.  And give those tactics back to them. 

Alinsky wrote in “Rules for Radicals” that when he organized the Blacks in Rochester, Ny, they talked about tactics that they could use.  One proposed tactic was to purchase 100 tickets for the Rochester Symphony, feed 100 Blacks three hours worth of baked beans, only baked beans, then send them to the symphony hall to enjoy the symphony and to sound off their protests. 

Since these are the tactics the Left understand, and since the Left has stunk up our Congress and our Nation for so long, I believe the time has come to let them know what we think of them.  I am proposing a National Been Feed and Congressional Meet in Washington DC on June 14, 2010.  It is Flag Day, a monday, and a working day for Congress.  It will also come at a reasonable time to help convince Obama that he lacks the support of the American people and to attempt to sway him into resigning now for the sake of the Nation.

A Losing Strategy For Afghanistan

December 6, 2009

President Obama chose West Point to mgive his speech on his new strategy for Afghanistan.  He got a luke warm reception at best.  Cadets appeared to be sleeping during Obama’s speech.  They had to be ordered to applaud.  Reports from soldiers in Afghanistan indicate that Obama did no better with the troops in the field. 

Obama announced that he was sending 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, but would withdraw them in 18 months.  What he failed to acknowledge was what has become know to the troops as the Karzai 12.  The Washington times described it this way, “

“Karzai 12″ refers to Afghanistan’s newly re-elected president, Hamid Karzai, and a dozen rules set down by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan, to try to keep Afghan civilian casualties to a minimum.

The Times compiled an informal list of the new rules from interviews with U.S. forces. Among them:

• No night or surprise searches.

• Villagers have to be warned prior to searches.

• ANA or ANP must accompany U.S. units on searches.

• U.S. soldiers may not fire at the enemy unless the enemy is preparing to fire first.

• U.S. forces cannot engage the enemy if civilians are present.

• Only women can search women.

• Troops can fire at an insurgent if they catch him placing an IED but not if insurgents are walking away from an area where explosives have been laid.

These rules sound great, if one is the enemy we are fighting.  They are a great way to lose a war.  They are an even greater way to get thousands of American soldiers and marines killed.  As the Times pointed out, the Taliban doesn’t have to obey these rules, only we do.  If Obama wants to win this war, he should take a lesson from the last great war the US actually fought to win.  He should look to our fathers and grandfathers that won WWII.  They carpet bomber Berlin and never lost a minute of sleep.  Any idea how many civilians died at that time?  Or when the Enola Gray dropped her nuclear bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima?  Did our leaders lose sleep over the loss of civilian lives then?  NO.  We did what we had to do to win, to protect American lives at home.  Obama is fighting this war like an idiot child with his “if we are nice to them, they will be nice to us attitude.” 

Should Obama send additional troops?  Without a doubt, he should send the 40,000 General McChrystal needs, and the additional 80,000 he would like to have.  And in order to actually win this war, Obama needs to immediately change the Rules of Engagement to reflect our desire to actually win.  The only rule we need is if they appear to be the enemy, kill them.  If civilians get hurt, sorry but it is a war, that is what happens in war.  Next time the civilians that don’t want to get hurt in war will stop the Taliban and their Al-Qaeda counterparts from starting a war with America.

Leaked Emails Fail To Slow Down Alarmists

December 6, 2009

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gets alot, if not most, of its “evidence” of climate change from Anglia University.  With that in mind, it should have been devastating to their cause when in fact, they seem to have taken a page from President Obama on healthcare, just ignore the opposition even though they outnumber you.

The first point of contention should be the theory that the emails were leaked from a “hacked” servor.  My understanding is that they weren’t hacked, they were released as a result of Britain’s version of the Freedom of Information Act.  A similar FOA for information from NASA has resulted in NASA refusing to release its data on climate change.  NASA recently, quietly changed its data to show that the 1930s were the hottest decade since records have been kept, not the 1990s as previously stated by NASA.  The mistake was the result of bad numbers according to NASA.

The second point of contention is that the emails show an intention to do several things which would be fraudulent at best and criminal at worst.  They specifically showed that the scientists that the UN rely on were changing numbers to make global warming appear real and dangerous, they showed that scientists were hiding evidence that stood in opposition to global warming, they showed that scientists were refusing to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests and would destroy documents before releasing them.  The documents also showed that there were no peer-reviewed studies unless they could be reviewed only by scientists that supported the global warming conspiracy.

This should give government and the UN pause on the issue of climate change.  It SHOULD.  It doesn’t, but it should.  In fact, government and the UN appear to be getting the wrong message.

Arthur Max and Karl Ritter of the Associated Press wrote, “The U.N.’s top climate official on Sunday conceded that hacked e-mails from climate scientists had damaged the image of global warming research but said evidence of a warming Earth is solid.”  Really?  Evidence is “solid”?  The emails showed that the evidence was FAKED.  Only a politician could honestly believe that “faked” evidence is solid, not unlike the Democrats that believe the people want their healthcare reform when all the polls show that fewer than 40% of America wants what the Dems are offering.  The article goes on to say the following, “

In an interview with The Associated Press ahead of the U.N. climate summit starting Monday, Yvo de Boer said the e-mails pilfered from a British university fueled skepticism among those who believe the science is manipulated to exaggerate global warming.

“I think a lot of people are skeptical about this issue in any case,” de Boer said. “And then when they have the feeling … that scientists are manipulating information in a certain direction then of course it causes concern in a number of people to say ‘you see I told you so, this is not a real issue.’”

It would be hard not to believe that scientists are manipulating evidence when you have the emails that say the scientists are manipulating evidence.  And that would tend to make people even more skeptical than they had previously been.  The UN is on top of the matter. 

E-mails stolen from the climate unit at the University of East Anglia appeared to show some of world’s leading scientists discussing ways to shield data from public scrutiny and suppress others’ work. Those who deny the influence of man-made climate change have seized on the correspondence to argue that scientists have been conspiring to hide evidence about global warming.

“This correspondence looks very bad,” said. “But I think both the university is looking into this (and) I believe there is a police investigation going on whether the e-mails were leaked or stolen.”

De Boer noted that the head of the U.N.’s expert panel on climate change, Rajendra Pachauri, had also announced that he would investigate the matter.

That should settle the matter.  Ignore the faked and manipulated evidence and concentrate on an investigation into how the emails became public.  Ignore the fact that Freedom of Information Act requests were being ignored by the scientists in question, and insist that the emails were “hacked” illegally.

Even the US Climate negotiator had a well thought out opinion.

U.S. climate negotiator Jonathan Pershing called the science on global warming “very robust, very substantial.” He told the AP that the controversy surrounding the leaked e-mails came at an “unfortunate” time, just before the long-awaited U.N. talks, “but has no fundamental bearing on the outcome.”

“Many of us have been exposed to those kind of events” where e-mails have been unintentionally published, he said. “All of us are adults. all of us are aware that there are consequences to writing e-mails, that the Internet is a very fluid place.”

So the problem isn’t that the evidence was manipulated to show a predetermined outcome, or that there was no peer review that might actually contradict the findings that global warming is man-caused, and no evidence that global warming was part of a natural cycle was considered. or even that the evidence was hidden from the public.  The problem is that the evil internet and the internet users hacked emails and released them.

The truth of global warming is that it has nothing to do with global warming, climate change, or greenhouse gases.  The sole purpose of the climate change issue is to take money from hard working wealthy nations to give to poorer nations.

Negotiators in Copenhagen are trying to set targets for controlling emissions of carbon dioxide and other global-warming gases, including by the leading contributors, China and the United States. They will also seek agreement on how much rich countries should pay to help poor nations to deal with climate change.

“Those are the two key issues,” de Boer said. “And if those can be unlocked I think the rest will come together as well.”

De Boer said he didn’t think the conference would fail because key nations have already made pledges on emissions and financial assistance — even though they are still short of what experts say is needed.

“It’s going to be two weeks of thorough negotiation to try and get the ambition level up and to get the financial specifics on the table,” de Boer said.

They won’t let false science get in the way of their true goal.  The true goal appears to be obamanomics on an international scale, take from the rich to help the poor remain poor.

North Korean Missile Test

October 13, 2009

Yesterday FoxNews reported another missile test by North Korea.  They fired five short range missiles, with a range of only 75 miles, The Obama Administrations response was, “We still want to talk to North Korea about their nuclear weapons program.  This doesn’t change anything.”

Last summer the North Koreans fired several medium range missiles, one of which has the potential to hit Hawaii.  I guess Obama will be willing to talk to them right up until Honolulu disappears in a blinding flash.  That should solve the birth certificate issue.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.